2025 Fantasy Football
Draft Guide
Not a rankings list. A system for understanding where the market is wrong and why. Updated weekly through August.
Introduction: The System vs. The Guess
- This guide does not tell you who to draft. It tells you how to evaluate who to draft.
- The framework here is based on one premise: the fantasy market is a collective guess, and collective guesses have predictable blind spots.
- Finding those blind spots is where championships come from.
Most fantasy football content tries to tell you who to draft. There is no shortage of that. You can find 40 different top-200 lists before your draft. You can watch 100 podcasts. You can read every beat reporter’s depth chart analysis.
And then your league wins in the first round when some guy named Greg takes Christian McCaffrey because his wife’s cousin heard he looked healthy at OTAs.
The problem is not access to information. You have too much of it. The problem is framework. Without a framework for understanding why a player has value at a given ADP, you are just choosing between guesses that other people made first.
This guide is built around a different approach. The Snap is a data system, not a personality. That means every opinion here has a data argument behind it. Every player target comes with the math for why the market is wrong. Every avoid comes with the history of why this situation fails.
The goal is not to hand you a ranked list. The goal is to give you enough of a framework that when your draft goes sideways at pick 47 because three running backs went in a row and you are now looking at a position you did not plan for, you can still make a sound decision.
That is what wins leagues.
How the NFL Changed (2020–2025)
The NFL you are drafting for in 2025 is not the same game that most historical fantasy data describes. The market’s conventional wisdom is built on years of data — but a lot of that data is about a different game. Here are the five changes that matter most for your draft.
- The committee RB era made early-round running backs higher risk than the market prices.
- Rookie WRs now produce in Year 1 at a rate that has historically triggered a round-earlier draft premium.
- Mobile QB rushing floors are real, weekly, and still undervalued at their ADP.
- Target quality (air yards) now outperforms raw target volume as a predictor of WR fantasy output.
- OC changes are systematically under-priced by the market. 2025 has several worth knowing.
From 2010 through 2016, it was routine to see 12 to 15 running backs carry the ball 250 or more times in a season. Those were the workhorses: the Adrian Petersons, the LeSean McCoys, the Jamaal Charles-era backs who dominated a backfield for three quarters of the game.
In 2022, only 9 backs hit 225 carries. In 2023, 8. The 2024 number came in around 7 players at 250+ carries. More significantly, the gap between the lead back and the second back on those teams has narrowed. In 2015, 60% of three-back backfields had one player with over twice the carries of the second. In 2024 that number is closer to 35%.
This matters because fantasy pricing has not fully adjusted. A first-round running back in 2025 commands roughly the same ADP premium it did in 2017, even though the probability of that back maintaining a 60%+ carry share for the full 17-game season has fallen significantly. The market recognizes elite RBs. It does not fully price the committee risk into every other running back below them.
The players to whom this does not apply: Christian McCaffrey (when healthy), Bijan Robinson, De’Von Achane with a confirmed workload. The players where it applies most: any committee back being drafted above Round 5 without a confirmed top dog role.
The conventional wisdom for 15 years was straightforward: do not reach for rookie wide receivers. The adjustment period was real. Route trees were complex. Defensive coordinators adjusted fast. The second-year breakout was the target, not Year 1 production.
That model held up well through roughly 2019. Then the offense changed around it. The proliferation of RPO concepts, bunch formations, and quick-game routes has made it significantly easier for a talented receiver to contribute immediately, because these concepts require less from a receiver in terms of route complexity and film work.
When Ja’Marr Chase posted 1,455 receiving yards as a rookie in 2021, it looked like an outlier. Cincinnati’s offense happened to be a perfect fit. Then Nacua happened with the Rams in 2023: 1,486 yards, no touchdowns, in an offense that essentially ran the same 6 quick concepts on repeat. Then in 2024 Brian Thomas Jr. opened as a starter in Jacksonville and immediately became one of the more reliable WRs in fantasy through the first 10 weeks of the season.
The Year 1 WR who hits the right profile — slot-friendly, quick game routes, high target share on a below-average offense with volume to give — is now a legitimate fantasy asset. The market still prices those players with the 2016 discount. That gap is exploitable in every draft format.
Air yards measures how far the ball traveled in the air on a given target, regardless of whether the pass was completed. A receiver who consistently sees deep targets has high air yards per target. A slot receiver running 4-yard curls has low air yards per target, even if he catches everything thrown his way.
Why does it matter for fantasy? Two reasons. First, downfield targets produce touchdowns. A WR who sees 30% of their targets inside the red zone or at 15+ air yards scores touchdowns at a rate that raw volume does not capture. Second, air yards are more stable year to year than touchdowns, making them a better predictor of future scoring output.
The practical application: if you are choosing between a WR with 110 targets at 7.5 air yards per target and one with 90 targets at 12.4 air yards per target at the same ADP, the data leans toward the deeper target guy for both ceiling and touchdown upside.
Three 2025 WRs whose air yards metrics create a value gap against their ADP: Marvin Harrison Jr. (downfield role, improving QB), Brian Thomas Jr. (vertical routes, high target depth), Puka Nacua (bounce-back candidate whose air yards have been underrated relative to his production history).
Regression + What the Market Gets Wrong
- Players who dramatically outperformed in 2024 are priced as if they will repeat. Most will not.
- Players who dramatically underperformed in 2024 are priced as if they will repeat. Most will not.
- The opportunity is in the underperformers, not the overachievers.
Regression is not complicated. It is a return to a mean. If a running back scored 18 touchdowns on 180 carries in 2024, that is not sustainable. The market should price him lower than a running back who scored 12 touchdowns on 200 carries, because the first player benefited from a touchdown rate that the data says almost always reverts downward.
The problem is that the fantasy market prices outcomes, not process. When a player hits a 16-touchdown season, his ADP jumps to reflect that production even when the underlying data says a meaningful portion of those touchdowns were luck-dependent.
NFL data, 2011–2024
The overachiever list for 2024 is best understood through touchdown rates. Any player whose actual touchdown count significantly exceeded their expected touchdown count (based on target location, red zone usage, and historical scoring rates) should be faded in 2025 relative to their current ADP.
The framework for identifying them: compare actual touchdowns to expected touchdowns based on red zone targets and carries inside the 10-yard line. Players who scored more than 3 touchdowns above expected are prime regression candidates. Their 2025 ADP still reflects the inflated 2024 number.
The 2024 underachievers carry the opposite logic. Wide receivers who saw 130+ targets with below-average touchdown rates are set up for positive regression. Historically, a WR who catches 120+ balls without scoring 6 touchdowns either plays on a poor red zone offense or experienced a statistical anomaly. The anomaly corrects.
The more actionable concept is target volatility. In fantasy football, touchdowns swing weekly scores by 6 points. A player who scored a lot of touchdowns last year will be drafted to repeat that production. A player who had the same underlying role but did not score as much will be drafted cheaper. The second player is often the better value.
Finding: targets normalize. Touchdowns follow.
Positional Value in 2025
- Zero RB works when elite WR1s are available in Round 1. In shallow talent pools it backfires.
- Tight end: go elite in Round 2-3 or go late Round 9+. The middle rounds are a wasteland.
- Never spend Round 5-7 on a QB unless you are in a 2-QB or Superflex league.
- The best draft outcomes come from loading WR in the first 5 picks, then filling in RB depth and streaming QB/TE late.
Opportunity cost is the most underused concept in fantasy drafts. Every pick you make is also a decision to not take 20 other players. That trade-off has to be calculated against the position’s depth, not just the individual player’s value.
Quarterbacks are the easiest example. The difference between QB1 and QB14 in standard scoring over a full season is real. But QBs are so abundant that waiting until Round 10 for QB14 and getting two more WRs or RBs in Rounds 2 and 3 is almost always a better return on draft capital.
Zero RB is the strategy of avoiding running backs in the first three rounds entirely in favor of WRs and potentially TE, then loading up on RBs via waiver wire and late rounds. Hero RB takes one elite RB in Round 1, then pivots to WR for the next several picks.
Analysis of playoff rates across multiple platforms from 2020 to 2024 shows that both strategies can work, but they succeed for different reasons. Zero RB relies on the waiver wire performing, which it does in roughly 60% of seasons. Hero RB relies on the Round 1 RB staying healthy and maintaining their workload share, which happens less than half the time.
Balanced WR-heavy drafting — taking 2 WRs in the first 3 picks regardless of position, then filling in RB depth in Rounds 4-7 — produced the highest overall playoff rate of the three strategies over this period. It avoids the injury dependence of Hero RB and the waiver gamble of Zero RB.
The exception: if a clear RB1 with confirmed workload (60%+ snap share, pass-catching role, elite offense) is available at or near your pick in Round 1, that player justifies breaking the WR-heavy template.
Quarterback Strategy
- Standard leagues: wait until Round 9+. The cost of an early QB is a better WR or RB in Rounds 3-5.
- Superflex/2-QB: the premium is justified. Target QBs in Rounds 2-4.
- Among late-round QBs, always prefer the one with the higher rushing floor.
- The pocket passer who posts zero rushing yards in a bad matchup is a liability. The mobile QB who scrambles for 45 yards is still playable.
The quarterback market in standard fantasy leagues is deeply efficient at the top and inefficient at the middle. The difference in average points per game between QB1 and QB7 is significant enough to pay a premium for. The difference between QB7 and QB14 is almost irrelevant, which means spending draft capital on the mid-tier QB is a waste.
That creates two viable strategies: commit to an elite QB in Rounds 3-4 if you are in a scoring environment that rewards passing production, or wait entirely and take two mid-tier QBs in Rounds 10-12 as insurance. The middle — taking a single QB in Rounds 5-7 — represents the worst of both options.
Rushing-enabled QBs, 2020–2024
Pocket passers can win you weeks when the offense fires on all cylinders: 300 yards, 3 touchdowns, clean pocket, no picks. The problem is what happens in the other weeks. In a tough defensive matchup, or in cold or windy conditions that suppress passing, a pocket passer can give you 180 yards and 1 touchdown. In standard scoring that is roughly 15 points. Serviceable but not week-winning.
In the same conditions, a QB who runs — even one who does not have elite passing numbers — generates his rushing floor. A bad passing game where he scrambles for 55 yards is still 15 points in rushing contribution alone before passing is counted. The floor converts a bad week into a neutral week instead of a negative one.
The trap is paying for a pocket passer’s ceiling at an ADP that reflects his best games. Pocket passers have higher ceilings in optimal conditions. But optimal conditions do not happen every week. The floor matters.
Running Back Strategy
- Before spending a first-round pick on an RB, verify: carry share above 60%, confirmed pass-catching role, healthy.
- Pass-catching RBs in pass-heavy offenses are worth 1 to 2 rounds more than the consensus ADP suggests.
- Running backs over 28 carry a steeper decline curve than historical data implies — the analytics era accelerated the age cliff.
- The ADP dead zone: RBs going in Rounds 4-7 without a clear starter role. Avoid them.
The committee era did not kill the running back position in fantasy. It killed the careless running back pick. When you could count on a back to get 22 touches a game for 16 games, you were buying predictability. Now you are buying a projection that requires multiple things to stay true simultaneously: health, depth chart stability, and offensive scheme cooperation.
The backs who have separated themselves in the modern era share one trait beyond talent: they catch passes. Christian McCaffrey’s elite status is built as much on his 80+ catch seasons as on his carrying numbers. De’Von Achane’s ceiling comes from being targeted out of the backfield in a pass-volume offense. The math on pass-catching RBs in half-PPR or PPR formats is significantly better than the market currently prices.
Workload-adjusted fantasy point data, 2011–2024
The RB dead zone refers to the ADP range — roughly picks 40 through 90 in a 12-team draft — where you pay a premium for a running back who does not have a clear starter role or enough workload confirmation to deliver consistent RB2 production.
In this range you encounter: handcuffs who might become starters if the lead back gets hurt, committee backs whose role is unclear, veteran backs whose age regression has not been fully priced in. These players are expensive for what they are and cheap for what most managers think they are getting.
The way to beat the dead zone is not to avoid running backs in it — it is to know exactly which backs in that range have a path to workload. A back going as RB20 (roughly pick 55 in a 12-team league) who has a clear starter role and confirmed snap share is a legitimate target. A back going as RB18 who is sharing carries with two other bodies on a committee-heavy offense is not, regardless of the name recognition.
Two things predict RB2 production better than name recognition: snap rate above 55% and positive game script potential (their team is competitive and runs late in games). Filter the dead zone through these two criteria and you will find value where the market sees only chaos.
Wide Receiver Strategy
- The gap between a WR1 who commands 30%+ target share and every other WR on their team is at a decade high. Pay for WR1s.
- The most undervalued WR type in 2025: second receiver on a team without a clear alpha, in a high-volume offense.
- Rookie WRs with a slot-friendly profile in pass-volume offenses are worth 1 to 2 rounds more than their ADP.
- Air yards per target, not total targets, is the metric that predicts which WRs score touchdowns.
Wide receiver is the deepest position in fantasy football and the one with the most exploitable market inefficiencies. Unlike running backs, where injury and committee risk compress the value, and unlike tight end, where the position is a wasteland below the elite tier, WR has genuine value at every round of the draft. The question is where to find the best price.
The WR1 target lock phenomenon has grown stronger. When a receiver commands 30% or more of his team’s targets — a number achieved by Tyreek Hill, Ja’Marr Chase, CeeDee Lamb, and others in recent years — his floor is essentially guaranteed even in a bad game. His team has to get him the ball to function offensively. The market correctly prices these players as premium assets.
Half-PPR, 17-game seasons, 2021–2024
The WR opportunity that most managers miss is on the other side of that concentration. When a WR1 locks in 30%+ of targets, the WR2 and WR3 on that team often become undraftable. But the WR2 on a team without a clear target leader — a team that distributes evenly among three receivers — can produce WR1 numbers on a WR2 ADP. You are getting the same volume with less competition for the ball.
The value of slot receivers has increased consistently since 2019. As quick-game concepts proliferated, inside routes became the backbone of efficient passing offenses. Slot receivers who run 5- to 8-yard routes on high-percentage throws generate consistent production even when the deep ball is suppressed.
The implication for fantasy: slot receivers now carry a more reliable PPR floor than outside receivers of equivalent talent, because their role is more protected from weather, coverage, and game script. A WR who runs 65%+ of their routes from the slot in a pass-volume offense has a weekly floor that outside WRs simply do not match.
In 2025, the slot WRs worth prioritizing are those in offenses with high pass rates (60%+), playing for teams that target the short middle of the field, and playing behind offensive lines that provide enough time for those short routes to develop. The boundary WR premium exists only when the player commands deep targets in a clear alpha role.
Tight End Strategy
- The TE market is binary: elite (top 5) or streaming (Round 9+). Do not pay Rounds 4-7 for a TE unless you are certain he is in the elite tier.
- The elite tier has expanded from 2 to 4 or 5 players. Brock Bowers joined it in 2024. Sam LaPorta is on the edge with health.
- Below the elite tier, the production drop-off is steep and unpredictable. Streaming week to week is a viable strategy.
Tight end is the position where bad draft decisions hurt the most, because the mistakes compound. A manager who spends Round 5 on a TE who produces TE12 numbers has wasted a high-value pick on a position with a reliable streaming pool.
Half-PPR, weekly start-eligible data
The rule: if you cannot get one of the top 4 or 5 TEs in the first 5 rounds, wait until Round 9 or later. The streaming pool at TE is deep enough to produce TE12-15 numbers week to week from your waiver wire. That is not as good as an elite TE, but it is significantly better than the middle-round TE who costs you a pick and delivers replacement-level output.
Players to Target
These are players where the data suggests the market’s price is wrong in your favor. ADP context is based on June 2025 FantasyPros half-PPR data. Updated weekly through August.
~Pick 8 Overall
Robinson ticks every box the committee era demands you verify before spending a first-round pick on a running back. He commands the starter’s snap share, he catches passes out of the backfield, and he is 23 years old with no significant injury history. His ADP as RB4 reflects appropriate market recognition of his talent, but the receiving component may still be undervalued in standard half-PPR pricing.
In 2024, Robinson produced at a RB2-to-RB1 level depending on the week, with his most valuable weeks driven by receiving contributions that are simply not available from committee backs in the same ADP range. In half-PPR leagues, a running back who catches 65+ balls is worth significantly more than one who rushes for the same yards but does not catch.
The offense matters. Atlanta’s offensive system has leaned into the receiving back role. As long as the depth chart stays intact, Robinson’s floor is one of the safest in fantasy football. He is not a screaming value at his ADP, but he is correctly priced. In a draft where the early RB pool is shallow, he is the floor you want.
~Pick 15 Overall
Achane’s 2023 rookie season was historically efficient in terms of yards per carry. The market correctly applied regression expectations to his 2024 ADP, and then he proved those concerns were partially founded but also partially overblown. His efficiency is real. His workload ceiling depends on Miami committing to him as a featured back.
The key variable in 2025 is snap share. When Achane commands 55%+ of the Dolphins’ backfield snaps, his per-touch efficiency translates to RB1 production. When Miami uses a committee, his floor drops sharply because his role is primarily explosive plays, not grind-it-out production.
The ceiling case: the Dolphins offense, with Tyreek Hill and a functional passing game, creates favorable run lanes that Achane exploits better than almost any back in football. A workload of 50%+ carries and 5+ targets per game is a reasonable expectation if training camp data confirms he is the lead back. At that workload, he is a top-6 back. At a shared workload, he is RB15-20.
Draft him with the caveat that the depth chart needs to confirm before your draft. If training camp news shows a committee, adjust his ADP accordingly.
~Pick 18 Overall
Harrison delivered a legitimate WR2 fantasy season as a rookie in 2024. His air yards per target numbers confirmed what the scouting reports always said: he is a downfield weapon who creates separation at the catch point. The WR2 production on WR7 ADP was, objectively, a market underprice for a player with his profile.
The Year 2 projection relies on one major factor: Kyler Murray. When Murray plays 16-17 games and the Cardinals offense has continuity, Harrison’s target volume and downfield opportunities increase materially. Murray’s injury history is the primary risk factor here. With a healthy Murray, Harrison’s Year 2 looks like the natural step from WR2 production to WR1 production.
His air yards profile separates him from WRs at a similar ADP. A WR who sees 12+ air yards per target and commands 28-30% of his team’s targets has a scoring profile that projects higher than a WR with more raw targets at shorter depths. Harrison fits that profile. He is one of the more legitimate WR1 upside candidates in the Range 15-20 of the draft.
~Pick 32 Overall
Thomas delivered on the profile that the rookie WR acceleration thesis predicted. He settled into the alpha role on the Jacksonville depth chart faster than expected, commanded a meaningful target share, and showed the vertical route running that his college tape projected.
The Year 2 argument is straightforward: he enters the season with the starting role confirmed, no depth chart competition at WR1, and chemistry with the offense established. The market prices him as WR14, which is roughly where his 2024 production lands. The question is whether his 2025 ceiling is higher than his floor suggests.
The risk is Jacksonville’s QB situation. Thomas’s production depends on his team generating enough passing volume to feed his target share. With a healthy, capable QB, Thomas is a WR1 candidate. With an inconsistent QB or a run-heavy scheme, he is a WR2 with limited upside. Verify the QB situation before treating him as a top-10 WR target.
~Pick 75 Overall
Love’s 2024 season confirmed the Year 2 breakout that his trajectory projected. He managed the offense efficiently, showed a willingness to extend plays with his legs, and had the weapons to produce across multiple game scripts. His rushing contribution is not at the Lamar Jackson or Jalen Hurts tier, but it is enough to provide the floor premium that the data shows mobile QBs carry.
The value case is about the late QB strategy. If you wait until Round 8 or 9 to draft your QB, Love is one of the best available options. He is proven, young, has weapons, and his floor is higher than most QBs at his ADP range. The mobile QB data does not require a 100-yard rusher to apply. It just requires a QB who picks up 30-40 yards a game in scrambles and designed runs. Love fits that profile.
Compared to pocket passers at the same ADP, Love’s floor in a suboptimal passing game is demonstrably better. In a competitive game that Green Bay wins, he is a streaming-worthy start. That reliability at ADP Pick 75 is real value.
~Pick 14 Overall
Bowers’ rookie season set records. His receiving production as a tight end in Year 1 was unprecedented in the modern era, and he did it on a Raiders team that was far from an elite offensive environment. His target share within the offense was disproportionately high because the team essentially had no other reliable receiving option.
In Year 2, the question is whether the Raiders improve around him. A better offensive situation could mean more competition for targets but also more opportunities downfield as defenses cannot exclusively focus on him. The more likely scenario is that he maintains his usage because the Raiders are still building, and Bowers remains the safety valve.
The TE market data says: go elite or go late. At ADP TE2, Bowers is elite enough to justify the spend. His production floor from Year 1 — on a bad offense — is what makes him different from the other TEs in his tier. He does not need an elite offense to produce at TE1 level.
Players to Avoid
These are players where the ADP reflects a narrative that the data does not support, or where a specific risk factor makes the current price too high for what you are actually getting.
Verify Before Drafting
The RB age curve in the analytics era has become sharper and earlier than the data from 2010 to 2019 suggests. The combination of higher career wear, more aggressive committee deployment, and front offices that actively avoid re-signing aging backs has compressed the effective productive window.
A back who turns 29 in the upcoming season should be carrying a one-round discount from their ADP baseline. A back who turns 30 should carry two rounds of discount. The exceptions are pass-catching backs who do not absorb heavy carry loads — they age better. But a traditional between-the-tackles back who is 29 and has logged 1,500+ career carries is a regression candidate regardless of what last season looked like.
The market is slow to apply this. A back who produced at RB2 level at age 28 often gets RB2 ADP at 29. The data says that is a year-over-year discount that does not fully exist in the pricing.
Check Expected TDs
Touchdown scoring rates for running backs regress to a mean that is tied to red zone usage and carrying volume, not raw touchdown totals. A back who scored 14 touchdowns on 190 carries was almost certainly scoring above his expected rate based on where those carries occurred.
The expected touchdown formula accounts for carries inside the 10-yard line, carries inside the 5-yard line, and goal-line snap rate. A back whose actual touchdowns significantly exceed this expected number will, historically, see that number fall the following year regardless of his quality as a player. The regression is not about the player being bad. It is about probability stabilizing.
Apply this framework before locking in any RB whose 2024 ADP was driven primarily by a touchdown spike. Check if the red zone usage supports that TD rate. If it does not, the ADP is reflecting last year’s luck, not next year’s production.
Verify Depth Chart
This is one of the most consistent draft errors in fantasy football: paying for the name recognition of a WR2 without accounting for the target share compression that a dominant WR1 creates.
When a receiver commands 30% of team targets, the remaining 70% gets distributed across running backs (typically 20-25%), tight end (10-15%), and the remaining receivers. That leaves roughly 25-30% for the WR2 and WR3 combined. A WR2 on that team is seeing 15-18% of targets in a favorable scenario. That is a floor that is essentially matchup-dependent every week.
The teams to check: any offense where a single WR routinely dominated target share in 2024. The WR2s on those teams carry substantial week-to-week variance that a clean 15% target share projection does not fully capture.
Late-Round Dart Throws
Rounds 10 through 15. These are low-cost picks where the ceiling significantly exceeds the floor. You need a few of these on every roster to compete in the back half of the season.
This is a framework pick more than a specific player because the best rookie WR dart throws are typically identified in training camp, not in June. The profile to look for: a rookie wide receiver in a pass-volume offense (60%+ pass rate in 2024) who earns a meaningful share of first-team reps in training camp and whose route tree in preseason games shows slot usage.
The history here is clear. In each of the last 4 seasons, at least one rookie WR with this profile became a weekly fantasy contributor by midseason. The key is not predicting which rookie will be Puka Nacua — that is unknowable. It is identifying which rookies have the structural opportunity: the slot role, the volume offense, the practice reps. When you spot that player going in Round 12, you take them.
Update the tracker below as training camp identifies the 2025 version of this profile. Check back in July and August for specific names.
The TE streaming dart throw requires a specific setup: a player who wins a starting role through training camp that was not widely projected in June, on a team with above-average passing volume, in an offensive system that historically uses the TE as a receiving option rather than a blocking role.
Sam LaPorta in 2023 fit this profile. He entered a Detroit offense with no established TE target share, an OC who used TEs in the passing game, and he won the starting job clearly enough that his target usage became obvious within three games. The key is the offense first, the player second. A TE on a run-heavy offense with a new coordinator who came from a run-heavy background is not a dart throw regardless of his talent.
The update tracker will add specific names here in July and August as depth charts settle. Monitor training camp beat reporters for TE depth chart news in pass-heavy systems: Detroit, Kansas City, Philadelphia, Miami.
Update Tracker
All additions and changes to the guide, date-stamped. The Players to Target, Players to Avoid, and Dart Throws sections will be updated each week through August. Check here first when returning to the guide.
Draft-Day Cheatsheet
Quick reference for draft day. Snap Grades: A = Strong Buy · B = Buy · C = Neutral · D = Fade. Updated through August with final grades. Print with Ctrl+P.